Now with the book accomplished and marked off the list, I've turned my attention to some much needed blog readings. Here are a few things worthy of your attention.
Brian McLaren mixes it up a little on Out of Ur with his interview on the nature of heaven and hell. The interview is refreshing and challenging, and the comments posted are just as entertaining. It's in three parts which you can read here and here and here.
McLaren was also interviewed by Lisa Ann Cockrel and Sojourners on his thoughts on the release of The Da Vinci Code. You can check out the full interview here. The most brilliant part of the interview [among many] was this...
I think a lot of people have read the book, not just as a popular page-turner but also as an experience in shared frustration with status-quo, male-dominated, power-oriented, cover-up-prone organized Christian religion. We need to ask ourselves why the vision of Jesus hinted at in Dan Brown's book is more interesting, attractive, and intriguing to these people than the standard vision of Jesus they hear about in church. Why would so many people be disappointed to find that Brown's version of Jesus has been largely discredited as fanciful and inaccurate, leaving only the church's conventional version? Is it possible that, even though Brown's fictional version misleads in many ways, it at least serves to open up the possibility that the church's conventional version of Jesus may not do him justice?
Perhaps we do need to re-imagine the kind of Jesus we are putting on display for the world.
My good friend Spencer Burke did an interview with Christianity Today for a future issue of Leadership Journal on consumerism in the church and why he fled the dream church job. It's going to be a great read when it comes out in full, but you can check out an excerpt here. Coming from a mega-church in the past, much like Spencer, I really resonated with what he had to say about consumerism in the church.
Bob Robinson has a thoughtful response to Mark Dever's article in Christianity Today regarding the absolute necessity of seeing the atonement through the lens of penal substitution. I don't think I can look at roses ever the same again. Dever's rhetoric in the original article was, well, a little disturbing. Bob response is balanced and insightful.
If you take a little gander over at the current readings you'll see The Da Vinci Code listed. Yes, it's true. I must be one of only a few handful of people on the face of the planet who have never read the book, so I decided that I better read it before the movie comes out.
Recent Comments